Table of Contents
- Srikkanth Blasts Gill’s T20I Appointment
- Why This Vice-Captaincy Decision Matters
- Who’s Being Left Out?
- The Ripple Effect on Team Balance
- Sources
Gill’s Vice-Captaincy Draws Fire from Ex-Captain Srikkanth
Former India captain and 1983 World Cup hero Krishnamachari Srikkanth has launched a scathing critique of the BCCI’s decision to name Shubman Gill as vice-captain for India’s T20I squad. In unusually blunt terms, Srikkanth questioned the very foundation of the appointment: “On what basis?”
Speaking to media ahead of India’s high-stakes T20I series, the veteran cricketer argued that Gill’s elevation to the leadership role isn’t just premature—it’s actively harming team selection integrity and blocking the path for more deserving, in-form players.
Why This Vice-Captaincy Decision Matters
At first glance, naming a vice-captain might seem like a routine administrative move. But in cricket—especially in the high-turnover world of T20Is—such roles carry heavy implications. A vice-captain is almost always guaranteed a spot in the XI, regardless of recent form or fitness.
That’s where the controversy begins. Critics like Srikkanth contend that by making Gill the deputy, selectors have effectively locked in a player who hasn’t consistently delivered in the shortest format, while sidelining explosive talents who are currently outperforming him.
Blocked Talent: Jaiswal and the Missed Opportunities
Srikkanth specifically pointed to Yashasvi Jaiswal, the left-handed opener who has lit up domestic and franchise cricket with his aggressive strokeplay and adaptability in powerplays.
“Jaiswal is scoring runs everywhere—Ranji, IPL, even in overseas conditions,” Srikkanth noted. “Yet he’s warming the bench while someone with a leadership tag gets automatic entry. That’s not meritocracy. That’s favoritism disguised as planning.”
Other names reportedly affected include Ruturaj Gaikwad and even Tilak Varma—players with stronger recent T20I stats than Gill, who averages just 24.6 in his last 15 T20 innings.
The Ripple Effect on Team Balance
Beyond individual careers, Srikkanth warned of a deeper structural issue: confusion in selection philosophy.
“When a player gets picked not because of performance but because he’s vice-captain, it sends the wrong message to the entire squad,” he said. “Youngsters stop believing that runs on the field matter more than titles in the dressing room.”
This ambiguity, he argues, disrupts team cohesion and long-term planning—especially critical as India builds toward the next T20 World Cup cycle.
Key Stats: Gill vs. Contenders (Last 12 Months in T20s)
| Player | Matches | Runs | Avg | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shubman Gill | 18 | 320 | 24.6 | 128 |
| Yashasvi Jaiswal | 22 | 610 | 35.9 | 152 |
| Ruturaj Gaikwad | 15 | 425 | 38.6 | 141 |
While Gill remains a mainstay in ODIs and Tests, his T20 credentials are under scrutiny—and Srikkanth’s outburst reflects a growing sentiment among former players and analysts.
As the debate intensifies, the BCCI faces mounting pressure to clarify its leadership criteria. Is vice-captaincy a reward for past contributions—or a strategic investment in future performance? For now, the answer remains unclear—and contentious.