The drama surrounding the T20 WC 2026 just escalated into a full-blown geopolitical standoff. After the ICC’s bombshell decision to replace Bangladesh with Scotland over security-related travel refusals, Pakistan has thrown its own wrench into the works. PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi has publicly stated that Pakistan’s participation in the tournament is not guaranteed—and that the final call lies solely with Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif .
“Let the Prime Minister come first,” Naqvi declared, signaling that the cricket board will not act independently of the federal government. This statement has sent shockwaves through the cricketing world, casting serious doubt on whether one of the sport’s most passionate nations will even take the field in the upcoming World Cup.
On the surface, this might seem like bureaucratic delay—but it’s far more strategic. The PCB is drawing a direct parallel between Bangladesh’s situation and Pakistan’s own potential stance. Since Bangladesh was removed for refusing to play in India due to security concerns, Pakistan—a nation with its own long-standing political tensions with India—is now questioning why it should be expected to participate under the same conditions .
Naqvi made it clear: the PCB operates under the directives of the Government of Pakistan. “We are a government department,” he emphasized, underscoring that cricket decisions are not made in isolation from national policy . This is a significant departure from the norm, where boards typically manage sporting logistics independently, even in politically sensitive contexts.
Mohsin Naqvi didn’t mince words when criticizing the ICC’s handling of the Bangladesh situation. He accused the global body of “unfair treatment” and “selective decision-making,” arguing that if Bangladesh’s security concerns were deemed invalid, then Pakistan’s similar concerns should also be acknowledged—or dismissed consistently .
His point cuts to the heart of a growing frustration among several Asian cricket boards: that the ICC prioritizes commercial interests (especially those tied to hosting in India) over genuine diplomatic and security realities. By highlighting this inconsistency, Naqvi is not just defending Bangladesh—he’s laying the groundwork for Pakistan to potentially withdraw without appearing politically motivated.
Unlike many other cricket-playing nations, Pakistan’s cricket board has historically been closely tied to the federal government. The current PCB structure, reformed under the National Cricket Board Ordinance, places the chairman as a de facto government appointee—currently held by Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi himself .
This means that major decisions—especially those involving travel to India—are treated as matters of state policy, not just sport. In past ICC events hosted in India (like the 2016 T20 World Cup), Pakistan did participate, but only after high-level security assurances and political clearance. With no such assurances reported for T20 WC 2026, and with regional tensions still simmering, the government may be reluctant to greenlight the tour.
Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif is currently abroad, and Naqvi confirmed that the decision will be made “once he returns” . Until then, Pakistan’s squad preparations, travel plans, and even player commitments remain in limbo.
If Pakistan follows Bangladesh’s path and refuses to participate, the fallout would be massive:
For fans, the prospect of a T20 World Cup without Pakistan is almost unthinkable. The team’s explosive talent—from Babar Azam to Shaheen Afridi—makes them perennial contenders and fan favorites worldwide.
On social media, Pakistani fans are divided. Some applaud Naqvi for standing firm on national sovereignty, while others fear their team will miss a golden opportunity to win a long-elusive ICC trophy. Globally, cricket analysts warn that the sport is entering a dangerous phase where geopolitics overrides competition.
As noted by the BBC’s cricket correspondent, “When cricket becomes a proxy for diplomacy, everyone loses—except maybe the lawyers” . The ICC, already under fire for inconsistent policies, now faces its biggest test yet in maintaining unity among its full members.
The T20 WC 2026 was meant to be a celebration of the game’s fastest format. Instead, it’s becoming a litmus test for international trust, security protocols, and the very independence of sport. With Bangladesh already out and Pakistan’s fate hanging on a prime ministerial decision, the ICC must act swiftly to restore confidence—or risk presiding over the most fragmented World Cup in history.
Joe Root delivered a vintage performance in Colombo, anchoring England's chase to level the ODI…
In a rain-affected thriller, India's U19 team delivered a masterclass against New Zealand, with captain…
The ICC has officially released revised fixtures for the 2026 Men’s T20 World Cup after…
The dream of a full-fledged India vs Pakistan bilateral cricket series is officially on ice.…
In a historic and controversial move, Bangladesh has been officially removed from the ICC Men’s…
With the T20 World Cup looming, Sanju Samson's struggles with the bat have opened the…