Irfan Pathan Slams Farhan: Century Not Enough

Can a century be a failure? Irfan Pathan says yes.

\n\n

You think 100 runs is always good. But in T20 cricket, the math is different. Pathan just proved that milestones mean nothing without context.

\n\n

\n\n

Here is the deal: The game has changed. You cannot play ODI cricket in a T20 match.

\n\n

Table of Contents

\n

\n
• The Controversy Explained

\n

• Why Strike Rate Wins

\n

• Irfan Pathan’s Viewpoint

\n

• T20 Cheat Sheet

\n

• Frequently Asked Questions

\n

\n\n

The Controversy Explained

\n\n

Sahibzada Farhan scored a hundred. Usually, this brings applause. Instead, it brought criticism.

\n\n

Pathan pointed out the tempo was wrong. But there’s a catch. The team needed speed, not just stability.

\n\n

[IMAGE PLACEHOLDER: Irfan Pathan speaking on broadcast vs Sahibzada Farhan batting | Alt Text: Irfan Pathan criticism Sahibzada Farhan century]

\n\n

You might feel bad for the player. But experts demand evolution. Staying static costs matches.

\n\n

Why Strike Rate Wins

\n\n

Think about the end goal. T20 is about maximizing 120 balls.

\n\n

A slow century blocks the strike. It prevents big hitters from coming in. This hurts the team.

\n\n

Pathan highlighted this specific issue. You need to rotate strike and boundary hit.

\n\n

If you hold one end up too long, the total suffers. That is the modern reality.

\n\n

Irfan Pathan’s Viewpoint

\n\n

Why does this matter to you? Because it defines winning cricket.

\n\n

Pathan is not alone. Many analysts agree now. Context is king.

\n\n

He wants players to adapt. The format dictates the style, not the other way around.

\n\n

This feedback helps players grow. It pushes them to be more aggressive.

\n\n

T20 Cheat Sheet

\n\n

Unsure what makes a good T20 innings? Use this checklist.

\n\n

\n
• Strike Rate: Must be above 130 for openers.

\n

• Boundaries: Aim for one every 4 balls.

\n

• Rotation: Keep the scoreboard moving constantly.

\n

• Finish: Accelerate in the last 5 overs.

\n

\n\n

Bottom line: Runs are vanity. Impact is sanity.

\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions

\n\n

Why did Irfan Pathan criticize the century?

\n

Irfan Pathan criticized the century because the strike rate was too low for the T20 format, prioritizing personal milestones over team needs.

\n\n

Is a century always good in T20 cricket?

\n

No, in T20 cricket, a slow century can hurt the team total if it consumes too many balls without enough boundaries.

\n\n

What is the ideal strike rate for T20?

\n

While it varies by position, a strike rate above 130-140 is generally considered competitive for top-order batsmen in modern T20s.

\n\n

---

\n\n

Now, I want to hear from you. Should players focus on centuries or strike rates? Drop your comment below.